The topic of the “American dream” must come up in every 11th
grade English class based on conversations I have had with my classmates. This, and the fact that we have discussed
this subject a good deal in our own class this semester made me hesitant to
pursue it on my own in one of these blog posts.
However, I realized that the “American dream” is not always as clear cut
as it is presented in “The Death of A Salesman”, Walt Whitman’s “Song of
Myself”, or “Rip Van Winkle”. Sometimes
it is just an undercurrent to the more obvious theme in a piece of
literature. Discussing nature in my
prior blog post made clear how much nature and the American dream are
connected, so below I go into depth on a variety of other areas of the American
dream. However, before delving into the
literature I want to briefly explain why the idea of the American dream is important to me. I appreciate our home for the freedoms and
opportunities it provides and this goes hand in hand with the idea. But the American dream means so much to the
evolution of the American identity and finding meaning in our past, present,
and future. I find inspiration in what
value the American dream holds in our history and its transformation parallel
to our evolving nation.
J. Hector St. John de Crevecoeur was
a native of France but lived in New York for a good bit of his adult life until
the American Revolution. At this point
his support of British rule in the colonies forced him to leave his home in New
York. His now famous letter, “What Is An
American,” reveals an interesting side to this supporter of British rule. One of his first observances of the new land
is admiring the development of what was once “wild.” (Crevecoeur 376) Like Freneau he sees the “New World” as
something to be tamed. However, the most
striking thing about Crevecoeur’s letter is his comparison of the colonies to
Europe. He describes the new world as a
picture of equality compared to Europe (376).
It is from this idea, and his suggestion of a completely new race, that Crevecoeur
starts to form a fresh take on the colonists.
“We are all animated with the spirit of an industry which is unfettered
and unrestrained, because each person works for himself.” (376) He is at times condescending towards a good
portion of Americans, “From this promiscuous breed, that race now called
Americans have arisen.” (376) By calling the land the “American asylum” and
painting a picture of the poor and downtrodden arriving in America and becoming
full citizens there certainly seems to be an air of superiority and lack of relatability. However, he ends on a positive note, summarizing
brilliantly what we today recognize as key characteristics of the American
dream and spirit, “Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race
of men, whose labours and posterity will one day cause great changes in the
world.” (378) Crevecoeur emphasizes that
these labors are a product of self-interest, getting to the heart of the
self-made man narrative so common in the American storyline. In the end, he calls the American a new man, but
I would argue he does not see himself as one.
Despite his amazing comprehension of the beginning of the American
character, the air of elitism and otherness sensed throughout his letter
suggest he does not identify as such. It
was exactly this separation of character and purpose that allowed him to be so
insightful and it is the leaving of those like him who supported crown rule
that allow the realization of being an American to fully take form.
Also from
this time period is Judith Sargent Murray’s “On the Equality of the
Sexes.” Although is does not directly
address what it means to be an American, Murray proves to readers that she is
everything good about Crevecoeur’s American.
Her push to explain that male and female minds are by nature equal is an
early form of women’s rights advocacy (Murray 404). Murray challenged the notion of male
superiority, arguing that education and opportunity would transform the lives
of women. This seems to be the spirit of
a true American. Although Crevecoeur probably
did not have Murray in mind when he was writing his letter, she fits the
description perfectly.
Toni
Morrison’s short story “Recitatif” challenges what we think of as a modern day
American by encouraging the reader to look at two characters of two different
races, but without identifying which character is black and which is
white. Their dreams, goals, and
accomplishments are a part of the puzzle—but the readers’ ability to use them
as clues also relies on their use of stereotypes. It makes us realize that there are even stereotypes
about parts of the American dream—who can accomplish it, what one wants out of
it, and who believes in it. As readers
we use where Twyla and Roberta end up living, who they marry, and their wealth
to discuss who is white and who is black.
Assumptions of race and class overlap, but so do the stereotypes
surrounding the two characters. Someone
who reads this today will have different ideas about why one character might be
white and the other black then someone reading this when it was first
published. This makes sense because as
Morrison successfully points out race is not a clear-cut line to be drawn, in
this case, between white and black Americans.
Works Cited
Crevecoeur, J.
Hector St. John de . “Letter III. What Is an American” The Bedford Anthology
of American Literature. Ed. Susan Belasco and Linck Johnson, Second ed. New
York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2014. 374-378. Print.
Morrison, Toni. “Recitatif.”
The Bedford Anthology of American Literature. Ed. Susan Belasco and
Linck Johnson, Second ed. New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2014. 2151-2167.
Print.
Murray, Judith
Sargent. “On the Equality of the Sexes” The Bedford Anthology of American
Literature. Ed. Susan Belasco and Linck Johnson, Second ed. New York: Bedford/St.
Martins, 2014. 401-406. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment